Compare
6-inch B.M.T.® vs B.M.T.® (Wrap): calories & nutrition compared
6-inch B.M.T.® is 0 calories lower. Below is a line-by-line comparison of 6-inch B.M.T.® and B.M.T.® (Wrap). Both columns are official published totals, copied from Subway's nutrition document rather than calculated here.
B.M.T.® (Wrap) — This row failed our consistency check
- Every value is byte-identical to 6" B.M.T.®. A wrap carries a footlong meat portion, so it should be noticeably higher — no other wrap matches its sandwich this way.
We show the official number unchanged. We could not check it against the original PDF, so treat it as unreliable and confirm with the store.
| per item, as published | 6-inch B.M.T.® | B.M.T.® (Wrap) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 610 | 610 | 0 |
| Protein | 27g | 27g | 0g |
| Fat | 36g | 36g | 0g |
| Carbs | 44g | 44g | 0g |
| Fiber | 2g | 2g | 0g |
| Sugar | 5g | 5g | 0g |
| Sodium | 1500mg | 1500mg | 0mg |
Browse all comparisons →
6-inch Grilled Chicken vs Grilled Chicken (Wrap)6-inch Grilled Chicken vs Grilled Chicken (Protein Bowl)Grilled Chicken (Protein Bowl) vs Grilled Chicken (Protein Bowl, Double protein)6-inch Tuna vs Tuna (Wrap)6-inch B.M.T.® vs 6-inch Oven-Roasted Turkey6-inch Meatball Marinara vs 6-inch Spicy Italian6-inch Steak Philly vs 6-inch Chipotle Philly6-inch Cold Cut Combo® vs 6-inch Black Forest Ham